top of page

256. The Prosocial Foundation of Morality

Defining Prosociality


Prosociality refers to behaviors that are intended to benefit others or promote harmonious relationships within a group. These behaviors can include acts of cooperation, altruism, empathy, and sharing, all of which contribute to the well-being of both individuals and the collective.


The Third-Party Perspective on Prosociality


In the realm of primate prosociality, the focus has often been on dyadic interactions. However, as William Search theorizes in his thought-provoking books "Why" and "Conversations with chatGPT: Exploring the Theory of Morality and Existence," human prosocial behavior extends beyond dyads to include third-party contexts. Social evaluation studies examine whether individuals avoid antisocial targets (negativity bias) or prefer prosocial and cooperative ones (positivity bias) after observing their interactions.

For example, Hamlin et al. (2007) discovered that babies favor agents who assist others rather than obstruct them. Intriguingly, when similar studies were conducted with bonobos, they exhibited a preference for hinderers over helpers. Abdai and Miklósi highlight the challenges in conducting animal social evaluation studies, especially in demonstrating positivity biases.


Positivity Bias: A Rarity Among Species?


Negativity biases may be more widespread across taxa, as avoiding harm is a universal necessity, while cooperation is less so. Positivity biases, corresponding to the third-party perspective on prosociality, have been observed in several non-human primate species but remain elusive due to methodological issues. These issues include the use of human subjects instead of conspecifics as target individuals (Abdai and Miklósi, 2016).


Human Prosociality: The Power of Perception


A crucial aspect of human prosociality stems from our tendency to evaluate others based on their prosocial behavior. When contemplating whether to act prosocially, we are acutely aware of any potential observers, demonstrating our strong concern for reputation. This sensitivity to audience perception differentiates us from other primates.


Dictator games, often used by behavioral economists to measure other-regarding preferences, illustrate this phenomenon. Even when there are no negative consequences for keeping the money, humans typically contribute a portion of it. Intriguingly, the mere addition of stylized eye-cues on the answer sheet increases prosocial donations in such games, emphasizing our preoccupation with reputation. In similar experiments involving chimpanzees, this effect was absent, suggesting that the heightened human sensitivity to potential conspecific observation is unique to our species.


The Moral Compass Theory: Prosocial Behavior as the Foundation of Human Existence


William Search's thought-provoking ideas in "Why" and "Conversations with chatGPT: Exploring the Theory of Morality and Existence" explore the notion that the essence of human existence lies in morality. One of the critical aspects of this moral compass theory is the role that prosocial behavior plays in shaping human morality.


Prosocial Behavior: The Guiding Force of Morality


As discussed earlier, humans exhibit unique prosocial tendencies that differentiate them from other primates. Our sensitivity to being observed, our concern for maintaining a positive reputation, and our willingness to cooperate with others are all integral components of our prosocial behavior. These prosocial instincts serve as the guiding force for our moral compass, leading us to act in ways that are beneficial to others and society at large.


In the moral compass theory, prosocial behavior is not merely an outcome of our evolutionary development; it is the very foundation of our existence. By engaging in prosocial actions, we reinforce the values and principles that define our moral framework. This interconnectedness between prosocial behavior and morality suggests that our existence is intrinsically linked to our capacity for empathy, cooperation, and altruism.


Cultivating a Moral Society through Prosocial Behavior


The moral compass theory posits that prosocial behavior is essential for fostering a moral society. Our ability to evaluate others based on their prosocial actions, along with our desire for a positive reputation, creates an environment that encourages individuals to act in the best interest of others. This collective pursuit of prosociality fosters a community built on trust, cooperation, and mutual understanding, which serves as the cornerstone of a moral society.


As our prosocial inclinations shape our moral compass, we become more attuned to the needs and well-being of others. This heightened awareness cultivates empathy and compassion, driving us to support those around us and contribute to the greater good. In this sense, the moral compass theory emphasizes that our existence is not solely about self-preservation but also about our capacity to care for and uplift others.


The Interdependence of Prosocial Behavior and Morality


In summary, the moral compass theory, as explored in William Search's "Why" and "Conversations with chatGPT: Exploring the Theory of Morality and Existence," underscores the interdependence between prosocial behavior and morality. Our unique prosocial tendencies serve as the bedrock of our moral framework, shaping the values and principles that govern our actions and interactions.


By engaging in prosocial behavior, we strengthen our moral compass and foster a society built on trust, cooperation, and compassion. This inherent link between prosociality and morality suggests that the very essence of human existence is rooted in our ability to empathize, collaborate, and care for one another, ultimately guiding us towards a more moral and harmonious world.




7 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page